Librello publishing house

Librello is an innovative open access academic publishing house based in Basel, Switzerland. Working on a membership basis, we decouple the payment from the publication and can afford a rigorous single-blind peer review process with no economic pressure. Authors are able to submit an unlimited number of manuscripts to all open access journals through an annual flat fee.

Latest publications

Migrants Meet Europeans

doi: 10.12924/johs2018.14010024 | Journal of Human Security | 2018 | Volume 14 | Issue 1

Alexander K. Lautensach

School of Education, University of Northern British Columbia, Canada

Views	198
PDF	159

HTML

Publication Date: 10 September 2018

Abstract: Seldom have I come across a book that incited in me conflicting reactions of such intensity. They stem from Murray’s reporting of facts—necessarily selective but shockingly effective; his conceptual analysis—eye-opening where it works but shallow and incomplete in other places; his conclusions—shattering mainstream platitudes and mis- conceptions but at times suffering from a narrowness of worldview and a dearth of historical perspective, not to mention a problematic interpretation of human security.

Refugees & Violent Group Grievance

doi: 10.12924/johs2018.14010013 | Journal of Human Security | 2018 | Volume 14 | Issue 1

Jason Christensen

University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Views	426
PDF	245

HTML

102

Publication Date: 21 August 2018

Abstract:

Do refugee inflows have an effect on state fragility? In this article I examine whether refugee inflows, commonly associated in the literature with economic and cultural pressures, result in a more fragile state by means of increased violent group grievance. Violent group grievance captures a distinct form of intrastate violence, specifically small-scale hate crimes and ethnic group clashes associated with powerlessness and discrimination. The main hypothesis in this paper is that refugee inflows may increase violent group grievance.

I examine the effect of refugee inflows on the level of domestic violent group grievance using quantitative analyses based on original large-N datasets and cross-sectional longitudinal models to fill gaps in the literature on state fragility. This study controls for alternative explanations and covers the time period between 2006 and 2014. The analysis results confirm the main hypothesis of this paper.

Labour Use on Organic Farms: A Review of Research since 2000

doi: 10.12924/of2018.04010007 | Organic Farming | 2018 | Volume 4 | Issue 1

Stefano Orsini ¹^,* , Susanne Padel ¹ and Nic Lampkin ¹

¹ The Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm, Berkshire, UK

* Corresponding author

Views	584
PDF	371

HTML

Publication Date: 22 June 2018

Abstract: Organic farming is frequently associated with claims of more labour requirements than conventional. However, there is a fragmented knowledge about labour use on organic farms in terms of workload, nature and quality of employment provided. In the context of a growing organic demand and a need for more farmers to convert to reach policy targets set by many EU governments, it seems crucial to understand labour trends on organic farms and to what extent labour requirements may hinder the adoption of the organic methods. This paper presents a review of mainly European literature published since 2000. Studies presenting results by farm type usually indicate higher labour use per hectare on organic than conventional arable farms, whereas similar or lower labour use is reported on organic livestock farms, and the results are mixed for other farm types. We have identified in the existing literature two broad dimensions directly related with labour use, which need to be considered in comparative studies, namely farm structure (including farm type, but also farm size and diversification activities), and technical efficiency. These two broad dimensions give us insights into some more specific factors affecting labour use, and how labour is related with productivity and technical efficiency. Overall it appears that claims that labour requirements represent a concrete obstacle to the adoption of the organic methods need to be treated with caution, and more research is needed to understand the role of labour in farmers’ decision to convert to organic farming. The review of the nature and quality of employment indicates positive health effects related to higher satisfaction and lower exposure to pesticides in organic agriculture as the most important advantages for farm workers. Overall, there is limited research on whether the organic sector provides better opportunities in terms of job prospects, wages and employment of women.

Towards the Evaluation of the Ecological Effectiveness of the Principles, Criteria and Indicators (PCI) of the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC): Case study in the Arkhangelsk Region in the Russian Federation

doi: 10.12924/cis2018.06010020 | Challenges in Sustainability | 2018 | Volume 6 | Issue 1

Jeanette Silvin Blumroeder ¹^,* , Peter Ralph Hobson ² , Uli Frank Graebener ³ , Joerg-Andreas Krueger ³ , Denis Dobrynin ⁴ , Natalya Burova ⁵ , Irina Amosa ⁵ , Susanne Winter ³ and Pierre Leonhard Ibisch ¹

¹ Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany

² Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Writtle University College, Writtle Chelmsford Essex, United Kingdom

³ WWF Germany, Berlin, Germany

⁴ WWF Russia, Arkhangelsk, Russia

⁵ Northern (Arctic) Federal University, Arkhangelsk, Russia

* Corresponding author

Views	617
PDF	631

HTML

110

Publication Date: 14 June 2018

Abstract: The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a voluntary sustainability standard with global reach that has been developed to encourage responsible and sustainable forest management. Despite its broad appeal, there is little scientific assessment to substantiate the effectiveness of FSC in the boreal zone. In this study, an ecosystem-based and participatory approach was applied to a case study in the Arkhangelsk Region of the Russia Federation to assess the potential influence of the principles, criteria and indicators of the Russian FSC standard. An ECOSEFFECT theoretical plausibility analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential effectiveness of FSC in safeguarding the ecological integrity of the ecosystem. Besides spatial analysis and a field visitation, core elements of the methodological procedure were workshops with experts and stakeholders who directly contributed to knowledge mapping and analysis. The results of the study suggest FSC can potentially influence and improve forest management including monitoring and evaluation, foster the institutional capacity, and enhance knowledge on the impacts of forest management. Theoretically, FSC has a certain potential to reduce a range of anthropogenic threats to the ecosystem, such as large-scale deforestation and forest degradation, logging of High Conservation Value Forests, large size of clear-cuts, excessive annual allowable cuts, damage to trees during forest operations, and hydrological changes. However, human-induced fire is the only ecological stress that was assumed to be effectively tackled through a strong and positive influence of FSC. The results of the theoretical analysis with a semi-quantitative evaluation revealed the potential for FSC to generate much more effective outcomes for biodiversity by prudently targeting key ecological problems. The biggest problem is the large-scale clear-cutting practice, especially within IFL. These devastating practices are not promoted by, but are compliant with the current Russian FSC standard. This feeds doubts about the consistency of FSC practice and its credibility.

A Multi-Criteria Approach for Assessing the Sustainability of Small-Scale Cooking and Sanitation Technologies

doi: 10.12924/cis2018.06010001 | Challenges in Sustainability | 2018 | Volume 6 | Issue 1

Ariane Krause ¹^,* and Johann Köppel ²

¹ Center for Technology and Society, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

² Environmental Assessment & Planning Research Group, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

* Corresponding author

Views	367
PDF	423

HTML

153

Publication Date: 11 June 2018

Abstract:

To reduce the consumption of firewood for cooking and to realise recycling-driven soil fertility management, three projects in Northwest Tanzania aim to provide the local smallholder community with cooking and sanitation alternatives. The present study proposes an integrated approach to assess the sustainability of the small-scale cooking and sanitation technologies. Based on the multi-criteria decision support approach (MC(D)A), we developed a decision-specific, locally adapted, and participatory assessment tool: the Multi-Criteria Technology Assessment (MCTA). Pre-testing of the tailored tool was set up with representatives of Tanzanian and German partners of case study projects. From a methodological perspective, we conclude that the MCTA uses a set of relevant criteria to realise a transparent and replicable computational Excel-tool. The combination of MC(D)A for structuring the assessment with analytical methods, such as Material Flow Analysis, for describing the performance of alternatives is a promising path for designing integrated approaches to sustainability assessments of technologies. Pre-testing of the tool served as a proof-of-concept for the general design of the method. Future applications and adjustments of the MCTA require the inclusion of end-users, a reasonable and participatory reduction of criteria, and an increase of feedback loops and group discussions between participants and the facilitator to support a common learning about the technologies and thorough understanding of the perspectives of participants.

Novel Plant Protection Regulation: New Perspectives for Organic Production

doi: 10.12924/of2018.04010003 | Organic Farming | 2018 | Volume 4 | Issue 1

Patrice A. Marchand

Institut Technique de l’Agriculture Biologique (ITAB), Paris, France

Views	363
PDF	383

HTML

Publication Date: 17 May 2018

Abstract:

So called ’active substances’ (A.S.) which are allowed in Organic Production are regularly criticized for different reasons. Previously, although permitted in Organic Farming some substances were not approved under EU general plant protection products (PPP) regulation; therefore they were removed for their toxicity or exhibited characteristics (persistence, broad spectrum). Recent approbations under different new Articles of the EC regulation 1107/2009, gave rise to substances granted without maximum residue limits (MRL). We previously described approved basic substance (Art. 23) as potential candidates for organic farming; here we describe low risk substances (Art. 22) as new implements for substitution of controversial organic biopesticides and consequently as candidates for substitution (Art. 24).

Research into Practice—Promoting Participation, Perseverance and Publications

doi: 10.12924/of2018.04010001 | Organic Farming | 2018 | Volume 4 | Issue 1

Thomas Felix Döring ^{1, 2}

¹ Editor-in-Chief of Organic Farming, Librello, Basel, Switzerland

² Agroecology and Organic Farming Group, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Views	324
PDF	339

HTML

138

Publication Date: 16 May 2018

Abstract: This year, organic farmers, advisors and researchers in the West of Germany celebrate the 25^th anniversary of the foundation of an organic research and demonstration network. Established to support and improve organic farming systems, the network is funded by the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia and is organized around 30 participating pilot farms called Leitbetriebe (‘leading farms’), with support from the university of Bonn and the Chamber of Agriculture For each of the practice-oriented research topics covered in this network, the typical five-year cycle of research involves a first year of experimental exploration and literature studies. The farmers participating in the pilot farm project discuss and select the topics of priority and review the research plans proposed by the scientists. This is followed by three years of systematic replicated field trials on several farms, and a final year of demonstration and evaluation, where the presentation of results is jointly done by farmers and researchers.

A Review of ‘Human Insecurities in Southeast Asia’

doi: 10.12924/johs2018.14010011 | Journal of Human Security | 2018 | Volume 14 | Issue 1

Marcos Alan S. V. Ferreira

Department of International Relations, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Brazil

Views	482
PDF	584

HTML

141

Publication Date: 8 May 2018

Abstract: Debates on human insecurities are crucial in a changing world that witnesses high social inequality, degradation of environment, social tensions and a growing violation of human rights. Unfortunately, all these issues permeate the social structures of Southeast Asian countries in different ways. In that region civil society faces problems that are diverse, as seen in the political tensions in Thailand, the deterritorialization of indigenous peoples in Philippines and Malaysia, human rights violations in Myanmar, and numerous other challenges. Such setting demands different approaches from institutions and communities to overcome pending risks threatening their populations.

“Food Security” versus Cash Transfers: Comparative Analysis of Social Security Approaches in India and Brazil

doi: 10.12924/johs2018.14010005 | Journal of Human Security | 2018 | Volume 14 | Issue 1

Carter Vance

Institute of Political Economy, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada

Views	548
PDF	476

HTML

124

Publication Date: 7 May 2018

Abstract: Amongst Global South nations grappling with the problems of both food security and poverty relief, two of the largest are Brazil and India. Though the nations of course differ in a host of socioeconomic, cultural and geopolitical respects, they do face similar problems of sharp income inequality, displacement of rural populations into cities and increasing battles over land and agricultural ownership. At the same time, both countries have had, until recently, a long period of sustained economic growth, as well as centre-left governments (the Workers’ Party in the case of Brazil, the Indian National Congress in the case of India), attempting to spread the benefits of that growth to a wider social strata. The differential approaches that the social security systems in each nation took in attempting to address the problem of food security are, therefore, instructive in understanding how these questions should be approached on a policy level. Though of course constrained in each case by differing economic and political contexts, as well as path dependencies within each country’s existing social protection regime, there are lessons in their successes and failures. Moreover, an approach which would recognize the best aspects of each policy program could be instrumental in designing a food security policy which reconciles institutional and individual problem levels. This paper will examine the political logics which informed both approaches, with an eye to seeing how these were played out in their concrete effects as implemented.

Editorial Volume 14

doi: 10.12924/johs2018.14010001 | Journal of Human Security | 2018 | Volume 14 | Issue 1

Sabina Lautensach ^{1, 2, 3}

¹ Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Human Security, Librello, Basel, Switzerland

² Human Security Institute, Canada

³ University of Northern British Columbia, Terrace, BC, V8G 4A2, Canada

Views	338
PDF	385

HTML

126

Publication Date: 7 May 2018

Abstract: Dear Reader, “Are we nuts?“ asked recently one of my favourite bloggers. She was referring to human behaviour that contravened the actor’s own explicit interests, as routinely reported in a cross-section of the average daily news. Her deceivingly simple question can be interpreted at the individual level (e.g. junk food) and the collective levels (e.g. gun use), applied to the short or longer term, to human nature as it manifested historically or to human behaviour at the present time. Her question could also have been directed at events not usually covered by the mainstream media, such as ecology and population issues, or the fact that the world’s most powerful country is now governed by a kakistocracy [1,2]. But even without singling out its worst offenders, collective policies around the world show a deplorable lack of scientific reason[3].

Our Journals:

Latest publications